Notes
Draft · pending reviewDesigning with recovery in mind
A draft framework for asking better questions about recovery objectives, dependencies, and validation.
Begin with the question
Before selecting a recovery mechanism, establish what needs to be recovered and why. This editorial outline proposes a way to organize that conversation; it is not a tested recovery plan.
Make objectives explicit
A useful review separates acceptable data loss from acceptable service interruption. Recovery point objectives (RPO) and recovery time objectives (RTO) need business context and a clearly defined service boundary.
Map dependencies
- Identify the services a workload depends on.
- Consider identity, name resolution, storage, and network dependencies.
- Describe the order in which services would need to return.
Plan for evidence
A design review should ask what a recovery exercise would demonstrate, what evidence would be retained, and how gaps would be tracked. A recovery claim needs validation within its actual operating context.
Before publication
Expand this outline with reviewed technical references and a sanitized illustrative scenario. No production procedure or outcome is implied by this draft.